EU AI Act and AI Governance
From regulatory uncertainty to a concrete plan, evidence and named responsibilities.
Most Greek organisations already use AI without having recorded it: customer-service chatbots, CV screening tools, drafting assistants, prediction models embedded in vendor software. The regulation does not ask whether you "do AI". It asks what you use, which risk category it falls into and what evidence you hold.
This service answers those three questions with concrete deliverables, in language that management, legal and IT can all read. We do not sell "compliance"; we document measures.
What it includes
Gap Analysis & Risk Register
Inventory of every AI system (your own and your vendors'), classification by the regulation's risk categories, gaps per article and a prioritised action plan.
AI Policy
An internal AI use and governance policy built in four phases: inventory, gap analysis, drafting, presentation to management. Tailored to your sector and to the tools you actually use.
AI Officer as a Service
Monthly support at a fixed cost: tracking new systems, assessing vendors, keeping the register current, answering customer and auditor questions.
ISO/IEC 42001 readiness
Mapping the AI management system standard onto what you already run (ISO 27001, 9001) and a roadmap to certification where it makes sense.
What stays with you
A register you understand, a policy that is followed because it was written for you, and a person who answers when a question comes up. Not a PDF in a drawer.
Let us find out where you stand.
A 30-minute conversation on where your organisation stands against the EU AI Act and what is worth doing first. You leave with a clear picture, not a sales pitch.